SEC Chairman Proposes Review of Rules Underpinning Stock Trading
(Bloomberg) — Wall Street’s top regulator is calling for a broad-based review of the rules that underpin trading in the U.S. equities market.
Market trading rules have come under scrutiny amid wild swings in meme stocks such as GameStop Corp. and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. While Gensler didn’t mention them by name, he directed some of his most pointed comments to market makers like Citadel Securities LLC and Virtu Financial Inc. Those firms pay retail brokers a fee to execute clients’ trade orders.
“Brokers profit when investors trade,” Gensler said in a speech at the Piper Sandler Global Exchange & FinTech Conference. “For those brokers who have these arrangements — and not all do — higher trading volume generates more payment for order flow. What makes the current zero-commission brokerage environment different is that investors do not see their costs as they’re executing trades, so they may perceive them as free.”
Virtu fell as much as 8.4% in New York trading. Interactive Brokers Group Inc. and Charles Schwab Corp. also declined.
Gensler, who took over the agency in April, has said previously that there are inherent conflicts tied to payment for order flow and that the SEC was looking closely at whether it needs to revamp regulations.
On Wednesday, Gensler said that he’d directed the SEC staff to focus on whether retail investors are indeed getting the best deal for their trades. He raised issues around so-called best-execution requirements that brokers must comply with when handling trades.
Gensler also questioned whether a national price reference known as the NBBO, which is used to determine whether brokers are meeting their best execution requirements, was an accurate benchmark for the market. He said that it might not be because a significant portion of trading is executed by wholesale brokerages and not on traditional platforms like the New York Stock Exchange.
During an interview on CNBC following the event, Gensler went further. He questioned the brokerage industry’s argument that payment-for-order-flow arrangements have allowed retail investors to trade stocks for free.
“I think that’s a mis-perception — it’s not free trading,” Gensler said. “It is zero commission, but not necessarily free,” he added, noting that the data brokerages gain is valuable.